×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

IDO 2025 Update - Council Amendments - Bodega - Rogers

Leave Comments for EPC consideration below.

This amendment from Councilor Nichole Rogers proposes changes to these IDO Subsections:

These amendments will be reviewed by the EPC at a hearing on October 28, 2025.

  • To be included in the staff report for EPC consideration, add comments below by 9 am on Friday, October 10th.
  • To be included in the packet for EPC consideration, add comments below by 9 am on Monday, October 20th.

Have questions?

Return to IDO Update 2025
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Comment Drag

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment

Jane Oct 8 2025 at 6:07PM on page 2

In addition to deliveries and waste handling that Patty cited, the current IDO would consider these "allowed" uses and permit a freestanding sign, 6' tall and 24 sq. feet in area in a residential neighborhood. At a minimum, a use specific standard should prohibit all freestanding signs. Conditional use review and decision criteria should require any signage to comply with Table 5-12-2 standards for R-1 zoning.

Jane Oct 8 2025 at 6:00PM on page 2

While a size limit of 3,000 sq ft is more reasonable than 5,000 sq ft, building footprint is not the only use specific standard that is relevant. Merely adding a use to 4-2-1 and specifying the geography it is allowed to occupy will not prevent significant adverse impacts on the surrounding area or mitigate material adverse effects that will follow including a commercial use in a residential area. At a minimum, any fundamentally different use from the underlying zoning category should only be a conditional use. Otherwise, this effectively changes R-1 to mixed-use.

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:39PM on page 4

The logistics of running a profitable general retail or grocery store out of a live-work situation is magical thinking! While there are many examples of 'corner stores' in years past--there was a store and a laundromat off the NW corner of Bandelier Elementary School--expecting that modality to work now is unrealistic.

Jane Sep 30 2025 at 6:36PM on page 4

What is a paired use?

Patricia Sep 22 2025 at 1:23PM on page 2

General retail, grocery stores and restaurants typically require deliveries and big trash dumpsters. How does this fit into an R-1 neighborhoood?

Patricia Sep 22 2025 at 9:59AM on page 2

So a small general retail use would be permitted to be zero-lot line and cover the entire site?
View all