×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

IDO 2025 Update - Council Amendments - ADU- Fiebelkorn

This amendment from Councilor Tammy Fiebelkorn proposes changes to IDO Subsection 14-16-4-3(F)(6).

 

Return to IDO Update 2025
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Commenting is closed for this document.

Jane Oct 1 2025 at 3:30PM on page 2

Is this what distinguishes an "attached" ADU from a duplex? I am unclear about the rationale for introducing a separate definition. What Use-Specific standards govern an attached ADU but not a duplex?

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:13PM on page 2

sorry, difference is not clear to me.

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:12PM on page 2

OK, don't understand why this is here instead of in 4-3(F)(6)(b)

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:10PM on page 2

Why? IDO amendments should not be the design police...

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:10PM on page 2

need to keep one or the other (side or rear). Every time you build right on a property line, it is an effective 'taking' of neighbor's property.

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:08PM on page 1

in other words, a duplex?

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:08PM on page 1

So, no setbacks?
View all