×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

IDO 2025 Update - Council Amendments - Townhouse - Rogers

This amendment from Councilor Nichole Rogers proposes changes to IDO Subsection 14-16-4-3(B)(6)(d).  

 

Return to IDO Update 2025
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Commenting is closed for this document.

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:05PM on page 1

oh, I see, this is the expansion of the foot in the door (O-24-69) to make townhomes permissive in R-1 EVERYWHERE

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:04PM on page 1

Didn't O-24-69 already make this permissive?

Evelyn B. Feltner Sep 30 2025 at 11:38AM on page 1

Another effort to allow multi-family housing within R-1 zones. Preceding effort to allow such on R-1 corner lots was voted against by Councilor Rogers in the LUPZ Committee hearing, so it seems very odd that she now wants to have 3 townhomes per neighborhood on any kind of R-1 lot. People buy in R-1 zones to live in neighborhoods that do not have multi-family housing; these kinds of amendments simply break the implied contract between the city and buyers with respect to zone designations. Doing that won't create enough new housing to make a difference in any claimed housing shortage; apartment blocks will do that, leave R-1 zones in peace.
View all