×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

IDO 2025 Update - Council Amendments - Duplex - Fiebelkorn

Leave Comments for EPC consideration below.

This amendment from Councilor Tammy Fiebelkorn proposes changes to IDO Subsection 14-16-4-3(B)(5).

These amendments will be reviewed by the EPC at a hearing on October 28, 2025.

  • To be included in the staff report for EPC consideration, add comments below by 9 am on Friday, October 10th.
  • To be included in the packet for EPC consideration, add comments below by 9 am on Monday, October 20th.

Have questions?

Return to IDO Update 2025
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Comment Drag

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:02PM on page 1

seems dumb to exclude R-A, aren't those often bigger lots?

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 12:00PM on page 1

agree that there should be no setback requirement (Obviously impossible) on common property line.

However, this can be architecturally complicated; for example, if two different owners, and roof repair is required, how is that handled?

Patricia Oct 1 2025 at 11:55AM on page 1

I thought the purpose of R-MC was "to accommodate manufactured home communities and to require this communities to incorporate high-quality planning and design."

By allowing SFH and now wanting to add duplexes, doesn't that potentially create risk for owners of mobile homes? Many mobile home communities are filled with residents who would not be able to move their homes if their park becomes 'bulldozer bait' for investment speculation.

Evelyn B. Feltner Sep 30 2025 at 11:33AM on page 1

This is another in a long line of efforts to undermine R-1 zoning. I thought when the LUPZ Committee voted 4-1 against letting multi-family housing go on R-1 corner lots, that the efforts would slow down. This amendment proposes wholesale permission for multi-family housing, with no height restrictions even, for R-1 zones everywhere. Ironically, it exempts R-A lots, which are, at least in the North Valley, usually large enough to accomodate multi-family housing with no problems.
View all